Cotswold Archaeology carried out an archaeological watching brief at Poole Pottery at the request of Chapman Lily Planning Limited on behalf of Fortitudo Ltd. All intrusive groundworks were monitored and non-archaeologically significant deposits were removed by the contractors under archaeological supervision. Before the start of groundworks, the Poole Pottery warehouse was demolished and the foundation removed causing a drop in elevation of the site by 0.5m.
No features or deposits of archaeological interest were observed and no artefactual material pre-dating the modern period was recorded. The extent of this deposit is unknown as the groundwork did not exceed a depth of 0.50m below the present ground level, but the natural geology was not exposed in this area.
Fragments of a clay tobacco pipe was recovered which is datable to the late 16th to the 19th century. Despite the archaeological potential of the site, the watching brief identified no archaeological remains within the area of observed groundworks.
Sources/Archives (1)
---XY SDO18103
Unpublished document: Edwards, N. 2021. Poole Pottery, Old Orchard, Poole, Dorset, Archaeological Watching Brief. [Mapped feature: #9745 ]
Map
Find a placename, postcode or grid reference
Map layers
Base layers
Info
Record list
Tools
The map is limited to 3000 records per layer so not all records are being displayed for this area. Zoom in to see more.
Record last edited
Nov 8 2024 10:58AM
Comments and Feedback
Do you have any questions or more information about this record? Please feel free to comment below with your name and email address. All comments are submitted to the website maintainers for moderation, and we aim to respond/publish as soon as possible. Comments, questions and answers that may be helpful to other users will be retained and displayed along with the name you supply. The email address you supply will never be displayed or shared.
Comments
Insert Link
Report Comment
Max 1000 characters. Plain text only.
Email User
Your message will be emailed to the person who posted this comment.